1. INTRODUCTION. It is well-known that if
is a Riemannian
manifold then the Riemannian distance from a fixed point
is smooth
on a set
, where
is a sufficiently small normal
neighbourhood of
. The aim of this paper is to generalize this result
over sub-Riemannian manifolds (theorems 1 and 2)1.
2. BASIC DEFINITIONS. Let
be a smooth (i.e. of class
) connected
-dimensional manifold,
a smooth
-dimensional
distribution on it,
, and
a smooth Riemannian metric on
.
The triple
is called a sub-Riemannian manifold.
We will deal only with a certain special class of curves, namely
In the sequel we shall assume that
satisfies Hörmander's condition
which guarantees that any two points of
can be joined by a horizontal
curve ([LS]).
Let
and denote by
the set of all horizontal curves
starting from
. The set
carries the natural structure of
Hilbert manifold (see [Bis]). Define the endpoint mapping
:
. It can
be proved that
is of class
([Bis]).
For a given horizontal curve
we
define its length
![]() |
(1) |
Now, we can define the sub-Riemannian distance
| (2) |
Fix a point
. From now on we will use the notation
| (3) |
We will say that a horizontal curve
is a geodesic if it
is locally length minimizing. By a regular geodesic we will mean a geodesic
which is a regular curve.
3. STATEMENT OF THE RESULTS. Let
be a smooth function defined on an open set
in
.
Using the Schwarz inequality we easily see that the horizontal gradient
is a direction of the steepest increase of the fuction
.
The following lemma is well-known and easy in the Riemannian case.
Liu and Sussman in [LS] prove that Hamiltonian geodesics are locally minimizing. Slight modification of their proof by the use of the horizontal gradient leads to a stronger result.
The lemma below simply says that if a point
can be joined to
by
a unique minimizing geodesic which is a regular curve, then the
sub-Riemannian exponential mapping is ''onto'' a certain neighbourhood of
(the fact being trivial in the Riemannian case).
Now we are prepared to prove the two theorems mentioned in the introduction.
(Proof. We choose
so small that Proposition 1 applies. Next
we use lemma 2 and Sard's theorem to the sub-Riemannian exponential mapping
to obtain the desired result).
Using the similar methods as in the proof of lemma 2 nad applying lemma 1 we obtain